“New Mexico high court hears ‘warrior gene’ arguments”

Robert Nott has this story in the Santa Fe New Mexican about yesterday’s oral argument in State v. Yepez, which involves the admissibility of evidence that the defendant’s genes predisposed him to act violently. While serving as a judge on the Court of Appeals, I wrote a concurring opinion in this case, expressing my view that it was unnecessary to reach the issue.

You can listen to the oral argument here.

This entry was posted in New Mexico Supreme Court, Oral Argument and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *