Skip to content
  • Home
  • Resources
← 10th Circuit upholds $60M breach of contract verdict in natural gas pricing dispute
NMSC: Public Regulation Commission’s approval of PNM’s 2018 renewable energy procurement plan affirmed →

Arguments in Florida v. Georgia to be heard in Albuquerque in December

by Emil J. Kiehne Posted on August 7, 2019

Tenth Circuit Judge Paul Kelly, whom the Supreme Court of the United States appointed as special master in Florida v. Georgia, has entered an order setting oral argument on December 16, 2019, at 10 a.m., at the Pete V. Domenici United States Courthouse in Albuquerque.

You can read more about this water dispute in this post by Lara Fowler at SCOTUSblog, and in this story by WFSU News. You can also read case documents in the online docket.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
This entry was posted in News, Oral Argument, United States Supreme Court and tagged Florida v. Georgia, Judge Paul Kelly, Water Law. Bookmark the permalink.
← 10th Circuit upholds $60M breach of contract verdict in natural gas pricing dispute
NMSC: Public Regulation Commission’s approval of PNM’s 2018 renewable energy procurement plan affirmed →

Comments are closed.

  • Contact Emil

    Phone: 505.848.1833
    Email: [email protected]
    500 Fourth Street NW, Suite 1000
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

  • Recent Posts

    • NMSC: Independent medical examination may be ordered in workers’ compensation death benefits cases
    • NMSC: Unfair Practices Act protects consumers, not competitors
    • “Medical damages debate hits NM Supreme Court”
    • CA10: Defect in notice to appear for removal hearing was not jurisdictional
    • CA10: District court should hold evidentiary hearing to determine whether trial counsel should have offered evidence of the defendant’s intellectual disability in death penalty case
  • Categories

    • Appellate Practice
    • Books
    • Events
    • Everything Else
    • Interview
    • Jurisdiction
    • New Mexico Court of Appeals
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • News
    • Opinions and Analysis
    • Oral Argument
    • Preservation of Error
    • Procedure
    • Tenth Circuit
    • Traps for the Unwary
    • Uncategorized
    • United States Supreme Court
  • Subscribe to My Feed

  • Connect with Emil

    Follow @EmilKiehne
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Resources

    New Mexico Blogs

    • New Mexico Politics with Joe Monahan
    • News New Mexico
    • Roundhouse Roundup

    Law Blogs

    • Above the Law
    • The Appellate Record
    • De Novo: A Virginia Appellate Law Blog
    • Drug and Device Law
    • Full Disclosure
    • How Appealing
    • NY Personal Injury Law Blog
    • Overlawyered
    • Point of Law
    • Rocky Mountain Appellate Blog
    • SCOTUSblog
    • Texas Appellate Law Blog
    • The Volokh Conspiracy
    • WSJ Law Blog

    Additional Resources

    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • New Mexico Court of Appeals
    • NM Compilation Commission (for NM appellate decisions)
    • Tenth Circuit
    • Navajo Nation Courts
    • Albuquerque Journal
    • Santa Fe New Mexican
    • New Mexico Business Weekly
  • Copyright © 2012-2019, Emil J. Kiehne. All Rights Reserved.

  • Archives

New Mexico & CA10 Appellate Blog
Proudly powered by WordPress.