Skip to content
  • Home
  • Resources
← Tenth Circuit “judges press Utah about polygamy ban in ‘Sister Wives’ case”
NM Court of Appeals: Attorney-client arbitration contracts must be supported by informed consent →

Panel sends all three Court of Appeals applicants to Governor Martinez

by Emil J. Kiehne Posted on February 1, 2016

My apologies for the lack of posting last week, but I was feeling a bit under the weather.

Last week the Judicial Nominating Commission sent the names of all three applicants for the presently vacant Court of Appeals–Stephen French, Julie Vargas, and Ned Fuller–to Governor Martinez.

For a good account of the interviews, read this report by Robert Nott in the Santa Fe New Mexican.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
This entry was posted in New Mexico Court of Appeals, News and tagged Judicial Candidates, Judicial Nominating Commission, Julie Vargas, Ned Fuller, Stephen French. Bookmark the permalink.
← Tenth Circuit “judges press Utah about polygamy ban in ‘Sister Wives’ case”
NM Court of Appeals: Attorney-client arbitration contracts must be supported by informed consent →

Comments are closed.

  • Contact Emil

    Phone: 505.848.1833
    Email: [email protected]
    500 Fourth Street NW, Suite 1000
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102

  • Recent Posts

    • NMSC: Independent medical examination may be ordered in workers’ compensation death benefits cases
    • NMSC: Unfair Practices Act protects consumers, not competitors
    • “Medical damages debate hits NM Supreme Court”
    • CA10: Defect in notice to appear for removal hearing was not jurisdictional
    • CA10: District court should hold evidentiary hearing to determine whether trial counsel should have offered evidence of the defendant’s intellectual disability in death penalty case
  • Categories

    • Appellate Practice
    • Books
    • Events
    • Everything Else
    • Interview
    • Jurisdiction
    • New Mexico Court of Appeals
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • News
    • Opinions and Analysis
    • Oral Argument
    • Preservation of Error
    • Procedure
    • Tenth Circuit
    • Traps for the Unwary
    • Uncategorized
    • United States Supreme Court
  • Subscribe to My Feed

  • Connect with Emil

    Follow @EmilKiehne
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Resources

    New Mexico Blogs

    • New Mexico Politics with Joe Monahan
    • News New Mexico
    • Roundhouse Roundup

    Law Blogs

    • Above the Law
    • The Appellate Record
    • De Novo: A Virginia Appellate Law Blog
    • Drug and Device Law
    • Full Disclosure
    • How Appealing
    • NY Personal Injury Law Blog
    • Overlawyered
    • Point of Law
    • Rocky Mountain Appellate Blog
    • SCOTUSblog
    • Texas Appellate Law Blog
    • The Volokh Conspiracy
    • WSJ Law Blog

    Additional Resources

    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • New Mexico Court of Appeals
    • NM Compilation Commission (for NM appellate decisions)
    • Tenth Circuit
    • Navajo Nation Courts
    • Albuquerque Journal
    • Santa Fe New Mexican
    • New Mexico Business Weekly
  • Copyright © 2012-2019, Emil J. Kiehne. All Rights Reserved.

  • Archives

New Mexico & CA10 Appellate Blog
Proudly powered by WordPress.